Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [sca-j] AI 2009-09-28-05 - unstated prereqs for JCI-TA-8005/8006

From
Combellack, Mark (Mark) <>
Date
2010-03-11T15:45:36+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-j] AI 2009-09-28-05 - unstated prereqs for JCI-TA-8005/8006
Title: Re: [sca-j] AI 2009-09-28-05 - unstated prereqs for JCI-TA-8005/8006

Hi Dave,

Thanks for the updated wording for this action item. I have applied it

to the updated POJO Test Assertions document that I am working on.

I'll also mark the action item as done for the agenda on Monday.

Mark

David Booz wrote:

> The last time we reviewed the POJO TA document, there was one action left

> undone which I'd like to try to cleanup now.  Mark, since you have the pen

> for this document, I'll just include my suggested changes in this email and

> you can include them in the text when you take your pass over the document

> this week.

>

> JCI-TA-8005 and 8006 are assertions for normative statement JCI80001, which

> is the monsterously large normative statement that defines the

> componentType introspection rules.  I believe that the missing unstated

> pre-reqs are:

>

> JCI-TA-8005 - prereqs do not include the fact that there must also be zero

> @Property and zero @Reference annotations.

>

> JCI-TA-8006 - I'm not sure what's wrong with the prereqs on this TA.  Looks

> ok to me.

>

> This completes my AI 2009-09-28-05

>

> Dave Booz

> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093

> e-mail:

>

>

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

>

>
Next in thread → Next in month →