Re: [sca-j] WD10 zip file

From
Mike Edwards <>
Date
2011-05-23T09:27:31+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-j] WD10 zip file
Anish,

No problem with the new WD10 and the
re-approval.

As for the new subdirectories

- I'm OK with the subdirectory for springci,

- but to have a further subdirectory
for each csd seems overkill.

We are switching from having one directory
with a lot of files to the opposite extreme of lots and lots of directories
each

with very few files.  The redundancy
of the directory names and the names of the files bothers me in this respect.

Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards
 Mail Point 137, Hursley
Park

STSM
 Winchester, Hants SO21
2JN

SCA & Services
Standards
 United Kingdom

Co-Chair OASIS SCA
Assembly TC
 

IBM Software Group
  

Phone:
+44-1962 818014
  

Mobile:
+44-7802-467431 (274097)
  

e-mail:

  

 

 

From:
Anish Karmarkar <>

To:
OASIS Java <>

Date:
20/05/2011 23:42

Subject:
[sca-j] WD10 zip file

Hi,

We approved WD09 as our CSD01 for Spring CI. The TC admin found a few 

issues with it:

1) We approved the doc file, but we need to submit the doc file as well

as the XSD. It is best to get approval on the zip file that contain both.

2) Since we approved the doc file, I had to create the zip file after 

the fact and therefore the timestamps on the doc file in the zip is 

different from the one we approved.

3) The name of the xsd file in the appendix was sca-spring-extension.xsd

and if we are to stay inline with the SCA naming convention (eg SCA 

BPEL) that we have adopted, it should be sca-spring-extensions.xsd (plural).

4) We agreed to move to the new OASIS naming guidelines, therefore there

needs to be a "v" in the name of the file before the version
number.

I have fixed all the problems and created a WD10 zip file [1]. We should

approve the new WD10 as CSD01. If the TC blesses it, I'll update the 

issues for creating CSD01 and PR01 with the new zip file.

This assumes that the file name is sca-springci-v1.1-WD10. The other 

option is sca-springci-spec-v1.1-WD10. We do use 'spec' in other SCA 

specs, but I find it to be redundant (what else could it be other than
a 

spec?). Since we are moving away from old naming convention, I thought

it was a good time to remove the 'spec' part. But if the TC decides to

keep the 'spec' part we can change this.

The other thing that we ought to discuss is creating subdirectories 

under docs.oasis-open.org for our specs/XSD/jar files. Because of the 

large number of specs and various CD/CSDs that this TC has to deal with,

as Robin had mentioned some time ago, it is increasingly getting messy.

Robin had suggested (and the new TC Admin Paul Knight has as well) 

creating a 'springci' or a 'springci-spec' subdirectory. We also have to

figure out whether we want the subdirectory under 'opencsa' or not. So

there are four options for the URLs:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-v1.1-csd01.doc

or

http://docs.oasis-open.org/sca-j/sca-springci-spec/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc

or

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-v1.1-csd01.doc

or

http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-springci-spec/v1.1/csd01/sca-springci-spec-v1.1-csd01.doc

I like the third option the best. But we need to decide on this. I'll 

put all of this on the agenda for monday.

Thanks.

-Anish

--

[1] 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42243/sca-springci-v1.1-WD10.zip

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU