Hello Ray,
Am 14.06.2012 16:40, schrieb Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress:
> For the SRU case, see section 11 (of SRU 2.0) "Diagnostics". There are
> surrogate and non-surrogate diagnostics, and there are fatal and non-fatal
> diagnostics. But a fatal diagnostic (which is what we're talking about) is
> always non-surrogate.
Yes, I'm aware of surrogate and non-surrogate diagnostics.
> Surrogate diagnostics go in <records>, non-surrogate in <diagnostics>, thus
> fatal diagnostics go in <diagnostics>.
Maybe the section in the spec could be a little improved, by extending
the example in the specification and indicate the other XML elements, so
people don't get the wrong impression to just return the <diagnostics>
elements. (And additionally maybe indicate that, if the endpoint can
know the operation, it can wrap it in the appropriate response element).
"
Non-surrogate, fatal diagnostic:
<explainResponse xmlns="...">
<version>1.1</version>
<record>
...
</record>
<diagnostics>
<diagnostic xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/diagnostic/">
<uri>info:srw/diagnostic/1/38</uri>
<details>10</details>
<message>Too many boolean operators, the maximum is 10. Please
try a less complex query.</message>
</diagnostic>
</diagnostics>
</explainResponse>
"
Thank you and best regards,
Oliver
--
Oliver Schonefeld
Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Zentrale Forschung
R5, 6-13, D-68161 Mannheim
+49-(0)621-1581-451 | http://www.ids-mannheim.de
