Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
>
>> I think Tony's version excludes queries like "and and and"
>> -- which may actually be a good thing.
>
> No no, definitely a bad thing! For example 'and' is Danish for 'duck'.
> Equally it means that you have to check to see if the term is reserved
> (and hence quote it) in interfaces rather than the much easier check to
> see if it has a space in it.
Okay. Is there any need of talking about reserved words at all then
-- as they don't actually appear to be reserved in any way. Or am I
missing something?
They actually seem more like contextual keywords -- if that is the
right phrase.
Ashley.
--
Ashley Sanders
Copac http://copac.ac.uk A Mimas service funded by JISC
