Well I'm sorry to hear that, but no worry, the issue will still be around,
at least until the following call. --Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "LeVan,Ralph" <>
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <>;
<>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.
Sadly, I won't be on the Monday call.
Ralph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:06 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.
>
> On the agenda for Monday.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <>
> To: "Kerry Blinco" <>;
> <>
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:25 AM
> Subject: RE: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.
>
>
> I'd really hate to see us try to shoehorn structure searching into CQL.
> I'd
> rather see support for XQuery as the query grammar in SRU than make CQL
> do
> everything that it already does plus everything that XQuery does.
>
>
>
> Ralph
