← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: LOTS OF MISSING STUFF FOR FTF3 DRAFT?
Actually, this version does not have the latest version of the producer/consumer diagram, which is attached in .ppt & .jpg formats. I don't see any other required changes. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Orchard, David [mailto:] > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:42 PM > To: ; > > Subject: RE: LOTS OF MISSING STUFF FOR FTF3 DRAFT? > > > The Architectural Model was submitted to the TC on May 18th, URL is > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/docs/draft-sstc- > use-domain-04. > doc > > These include changes from the last F2F. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > [mailto:] > > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:45 AM > > To: > > Subject: LOTS OF MISSING STUFF FOR FTF3 DRAFT? > > Importance: High > > > > > > All, > > > > Here's what I think I have right now for the FTF #3 draft: > > > > > > > > Use Cases & Requirements (separate doc) NO NEW MATERIAL > > RECEIVED FOR FTF3 > > > > Architectural Model NO NEW MATERIAL RECEIVED FOR FTF3 > > > > Core Assertions yes (2!) > > > > Request/Response Protocols NO NEW MATERIAL > > RECEIVED FOR FTF3 > > > > Bindings yes > > > > Conformance yes (but only .PDF > > -- no .DOC) > > > > Glossary NO NEW MATERIAL RECEIVED FOR FTF3 > > > > Issues (separate doc) NO NEW MATERIAL > > RECEIVED FOR FTF3 > > > > > > I'd like to get material for the missing sections or else > > instructions to > > use the FTF2 materials for these sections > > before I begin assembling the document. Please help me out here!! > > > > --bob > > > > Bob Blakley (, regardless of what the email > > headers may > > say!) > > Chief Scientist > > Enterprise Solutions Unit > > Tivoli Systems, Inc. (an IBM Company) > > >
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →