[security-editors] comments on draft-sstc-core-31 &draft-sstc-bindings-model-14

Jeff,
Not sure why I got this not authorized message. I am part of the
committee. I am resending some comments I had.

Thanks

Bhavna


 wrote:

> Your message to the elist is being returned to you because you are not
> authorized to submit messages to the elist.  There are only two possible
> reasons for this.
>
> 1. The elist is restricted and very few people are permitted to submit
>    messages.  If you think you are one of those very few people replying
>    to this message will put you in touch with a person with whom you may
>    discuss the issue.
>
> 2. The elist only permits subscribers to submit messages to it.  The
>    test of whether or not you are a subscriber is a comparison of your
>    envelope from header with the email addresses of the list of
>    subscribers.  The envelope from header is the value specified by your
>    email system as the origin of the message.  This is different than
>    the message from header which is specified by your email client and
>    what you see whenever you display an email message.
>
>    If you believe you are subscribed to this elist and should be able to
>    submit messages to it, replying to this message will put you in touch
>    with a person with whom you may discuss the issue.
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: comments on draft-sstc-core-31 & draft-sstc-bindings-model-14
> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:48:46 -0700
> From: bhavna bhatnagar <>
> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc
> To: oasis sstc <>
> References: <>
>
> some minor comments:
> draft-sstc-core-31:
>  line 319 - need a space in  between "statementsmerely".
> line 369 and other places : I see "??" in lots of places, intentional or just something
> I am seeing.
> line 441: should be Element <AssertionIDReference>
> line 442: replace <AssertionID> with <AssertionIDReference>.
>
> draft-sstc-bindings-model-14
> line 464: probably need to replace "assertion consumer" by "artifact receiver".
> line 468: same change as on 464
> line 620: replace <AuthenticationLocality> with <SubjectLocality>
>
> Thanks
>
> Bhavna Bhatnagar