Re: Issue "states"? (was: [security-services] Updated Issues List)

"Ahmed, Zahid" wrote:
> 
> I noticed that the Issue:[UC-2-05] pertaining to B2B
> authentication is currently has Status:
> 
>         "Voted, No conclusion".
> 
> [...]
> which we decided not to support in SAML 1.0, I propose
> that we classify this issue:2-05 as deferred.

I agree, it should be deferred. 


JeffH