Prateek said:
> Asserting two syntactically distinct subject designators as "equivalent" is
> a whole another matter and one for which we
> neither have a use-case or even an extended discussion on the
> list.
Folks, I'm sorry to be so dim, but, I'm still confused
as to whether s1 & s2 are the same. Line 985 of core-25
says "MUST be identical", but then goes on to say that
"at least one" confirmation method "MUST match".
I haven't really looked for other cases where Subject
elements might have to be compared but I imagine it'll
be a fairly common thing for PEPs/PDPs to be doing.
Stephen.
PS: s1 & s2 were:
> > 3) Let s1 = <Subject><n-i=fred/></Subject> and
> > s2 = <Subject><n-i=fred/><s-c=fred-cert/></Subject> (i.e. s2
> > is s1 with the addition of a SubjectConfirmation).
--
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell
Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8. mailto:
Ireland http://www.baltimore.com
