← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[security-services] Issue for future discussion: ID attributes
In the course of implementing signing support, I came to the conclusion that one of the suggestions made in the past by Eve to support an XML ID attribute for Request, Response, and Assertion would be a good idea. There are lots of potentially uses in XML, for example the ability to build links to these things with XPointers, which is useful in simplifying the signing transforms. I don't think it's necessary for this use of ID to overlap/merge with the existing SAML ID attributes, though it could. This also can be added post 1.0 without compatibility problems, so it's not a major issue. -- Scott
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →