RE: [security-services] RE: Comments on XML signature guidelines draft

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2002-10-01T15:22:35+00:00
ID
001b01c2695e$2e6f3ec0$01fea8c0@SAIDIN
Thread
RE: [security-services] RE: Comments on XML signature guidelines draft
> Not the attribute itself must be named "ID", but it must be 
> of type "xsd:ID", which is a predefined type of the XML schema. 
> So it would be sufficient to type "AssertionID", "RequestID" 
> and "ResponseID" not with the self-made "IDType" in the SAML 
> Assertion schema, but to the standard ID type from XML schema.

It's possible, but while there may not be an obvious use case for
putting the same assertion more than once in a document, something about
that makes me a little uncomfortable...

-- Scott