Yeah, I put the V1.2 part in brackets because I didn't know if it was
appropriate to put out a formal goal statement that mentions something
that's as yet unsubmitted. How about this sleight-of-hand?
"This support will be based on the ID-FF specifications contributed by
the Liberty Alliance to the TC."
Let's see if we can get TC agreement on this whole statement at the next
telecon.
Eve
Mishra, Prateek wrote:
> Eve,
>
> Your re-spin works for me except for:
>
> This support will be based on the Liberty
>
>>>Alliance ID-FF
>>>V1.1 [and V1.2?] specifications that were contributed to the TC.
>
>
> I believe this should read ID-FF V1.1 and V1.2 specifications. The former
> has been submitted to the TC and the latter has been requested from the
> Liberty Alliance Organization.
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Products, Technologies, and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
**********************************************************************
SunNetwork 2003 Conference and Pavilion http://www.sun.com/sunnetwork
September 16-18, 2003 Moscone Center, San Francisco
An unparalleled event in network computing! Make the net work for you!
