On 10/23/06, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
> > but the definition of strongly matches in section 3.3.4 does not
> > relate Subjects to NameIDs, it relates Subjects to Subjects, so the
> > above statement makes no sense. The same is true of lines 1299--1301
> > of SAMLProf.
>
> "No sense" seems a bit strong.
Sorry, I meant it makes no *logical* sense, strictly speaking.
> Obviously, the meaning was that the
> identifier in the assertion Subject is identical to the one in the message.
Of course, I knew that. ;-) But that has little to do with "strongly
matches", right?
Tom
