Re: [security-services] FW: SAML Conformance Question

On 11/15/13, 12:42 PM, "Hal Lockhart" <> wrote:

> 
>I am looking for clarification on SP Lite conformance requirements with
>regard to the Enhanced Client/Proxy SSO, PAOS requirement in table 2 of
>the above linked document (which is a MUST for all operational modes of
>conformance).  Our binding communicates via passed xml, in similar
>fashion to SOAP, but with slightly different schema.

Which means you've broken interop.

>Our app also does not interact with ECPs that aren¹t ours, or that aren¹t
>using our custom binding.  We are planning to authenticate 3rd party ECPs
>via
> API instead.  

Then you aren't doing ECP and wouldn't be conformant with SP-Lite.

-- Scott