I have created another version of the session management use cases.
Changes:
. I put back all of the issues, even if I disagreed with them being
associated. I added commentary to indicate such. The numbering now matches
the original section.
. I introduced the notion of requirements nomenclature in addition to
issues, ie CR-3-1:UserSession: [OSSML] shall support web user session(s).
. ensured every issue/req had a possible resolutions section, even if
repetitive.
. Cleaned up much of the text.
Ed note: I think the overlap between issues and requirements is a bit
painful for the use case/reqs team. Every requirement we have may be an
issue, and every issue probably is a potential requirement. We may want to
use the issue notation for the rest of the work, but focus just on reqs for
our group.
Cheers,
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Platt [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:12 PM
> To: Orchard, David; UseCaseList
> Subject: RE: Session Management Use case, scenario and issues
>
>
> Thanks, David.
>
> My specific comments are inline in blue text in the attached
> doc. Here are
> my hi-level comments:
> - There are issues that are on the issue list that are
> not in your doc.
> - The issue numbering is inconsistent with the
> numbering in the issues doc.
> That will cause confusion. What may happen is that as you
> investigate this
> issue group, you discover additional issues, which should be
> added to the
> end of the list. Propose resolution text for voting for
> these new issues as
> well if you can. If we are unable to resolve them via vote,
> they will be
> added to the issue list of the next strawman.
> - We need to propose resolutions which can be voted on
> for each issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Orchard, David [mailto:]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 5:36 PM
> > To: ''
> > Subject: Session Management Use case, scenario and issues
> >
> >
> > Apologies for the slight delay, here is what I have been
> able to come up
> > with.
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave Orchard
> > XML Architect
> > Jamcracker Inc., 19000 Homestead Dr., Cupertino, CA 95014
> > p: 408.864.5118 m: 604.908.8425 f: 408.725.4310
> >
> > Named to Red Herring's list of 100 Most Important Companies:
> > www.redherring.com/mag/issue79/herring100/jamcracker.html
> >
> >
>
