My $0.02..
Darren Platt wrote:
> 1. Have the scenarios that are relevant to a specific use case follow that
> use case in the document. That way there will essentially be 2 sections of
> scenarios (based on the current scope) - one for each of the high level use
> cases (Single Signon and Authorization Service).
sounds fine.
> 2. Change all references to authC to authN. I think this was the
> convention we agreed to as a TC.
Yes.
> 3. Use Dave Orchard's suggested notation for candidate requirements in the
> issues list and ballots.
sounds fine.
thanks,
JeffH
