>>>>> "MP" == Mishra, Prateek <> writes:
MP> I realize we had agreed not to start a discussion, but this
MP> issue group has entered into the closing stage very
MP> recently. So I do have a question for you?
MP> How is this use-case different from the existing use case 2 in
MP> Strawman 2? I should have brought this up in the call
MP> yesterday. My belief is your scenario N is precisely an
MP> instance of use case 2.
Prateek,
I think I should probably address this. The use case scenario is one
that I added, for the exact reason that you suggest -- it's an
instance of use case 2. I think we should have at least one specific
scenario for each use case.
Do you disagree with that, or do you think the use case is not
specific enough?
~ESP
