← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

ISSUE:[UC-8-0*:Intermediaries*]

From
Orchard, David <>
Date
2001-03-21T05:31:59+00:00
ID
Thread
ISSUE:[UC-8-0*:Intermediaries*]
I am baffled that this has not generated more discussion.  The role of
intermediaries and security on XML Protocol has been going on for months
now.

I would have liked to see more discussion on our domain model/abstract model
on this concept.  I show the following links to illustrate XP's discussion
of intermediaries as it seems extremely relevent.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xp-reqs-05.html#fig1 Requirements doc
showing intermediaries


There is a good definition of an XP Intermediary, which seems equivalent to
a SAML intermediary:


Dave Orchard
XML Architect
Jamcracker Inc.,    19000 Homestead Dr., Cupertino, CA 95014
p: 408.864.5118     m: 604.908.8425    f: 408.725.4310

www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →