Ron & Frank,
In this case, I am expecting Frank to do the integration of your draft.
I've attached the _current_ semantics section in its entirety, maybe you
can take a stab at working your part in.
-Matt
Schuldt, Ron L wrote:
>Matt and Editors,
>
>I took Frank's input and attempted to make it more succinct. I also added the "context" bullet as another type of metadata relevant to semantics.
>
>Note: I chose to use the term "principals" rather than "participants" in my version. I believe the term participants carries a stronger "person" flavor than the term "principals"
>
>I believe we want a term that connotes people and/or systems. The term "entities" might work but that term carries data modeling baggage which I would like to avoid if possible.
>
>Frank - feel free to counter with something else.
>
> <<Semanticsv2.doc>>
>Matt - I assume you will collate the various inputs into a new combined draft.
>
>Ron Schuldt
>Senior Staff Systems Architect
>Lockheed Martin Enterprise Information Systems
>11757 W. Ken Caryl Ave.
>#F521 Mail Point DC5694
>Littleton, CO 80127
>303-977-1414
>
>
>
>
