Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [soa-rm-editors] idea from ftf on RM/RA/A - follow-up question

From
Ken Laskey <>
Date
2005-08-24T18:37:27+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [soa-rm-editors] idea from ftf on RM/RA/A - follow-up question
Duane,

You missed the question.  I completely agree this is too specific for 
the RM -- my question (given the previous email's attempt to clarify 
RM vs.RA vs. A) is whether the triangle is an example of a specific 
RA or a specific architecture.

Ken

At 02:07 PM 8/24/2005, Duane Nickull wrote:
>Ken:
>
>I think it may be too prescriptive for RM since it only espouses one 
>particular model for discovery.  Others include the WS-Eventing 
>model (Push/multi-cast and push/broadcast) and probe() type methods.
>Centralization is one way to do it but not the only way.
>
>Duane
>
>Ken Laskey wrote:
>
>>Is the typical publish-find-bind triangle a RA or A?
>>
>>Ken
>>
>>--
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>>   /   Ken 
>> Laskey                                                                \
>>  |    MITRE Corporation, M/S H305    phone:  703-983-7934   |
>>  |    7515 Colshire Drive                    fax:      703-983-1379   |
>>   \   McLean VA 22102-7508                                              /
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>>

--
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   /   Ken 
Laskey                                                                \
  |    MITRE Corporation, M/S H305    phone:  703-983-7934   |
  |    7515 Colshire Drive                    fax:      703-983-1379   |
   \   McLean VA 22102-7508                                              /
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next in thread → Next in month →