No I don't fully agree with this. 3.1 introduced the model, section 2
introduces SOA -- they are different.
However, 3.1 could stand some redaction...
Frank
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:55 AM, Ken Laskey wrote:
> On a quick look, one thing I noticed was we added Section 2 but
> also retained Section 3.1. Now it really seems redundant. I will
> try to indicate some specific edits but my initial suggestion is to
> remove Section 3.1 and promote section 3.2 to 3. Having not read
> the latest, I'm not sure if Sections 3.3-3.6 stay with a revised
> Section 3 or become a new Section 4.
>
> Other opinions welcome.
>
> Ken
>
> On Nov 1, 2005, at 7:48 AM, Matt MacKenzie wrote:
>
>> Team:
>>
>> Here is the Draft 10 candidate. If there is agreement of this
>> team, I
>> will knock off the ED and post it to the main list.
>>
>> Please, send in your votes. If there is a no, deliver it with at
>> least
>> one proposed change :-)
>>
>> -Matt
>> <wd-soa-rm-10ED.pdf>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------
> Ken Laskey
> MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
> 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
> McLean VA 22102-7508
>
