My question still holds: do I really care what type of service as long as I can assess the appropriateness of the real world effects.
The idea of "certain types of service" gets into the FEA endless cycle of are you type A or type B when you're really some of each, what if you support multiple lines of business, ...
Sometimes associating something with categories helps but that is part of description. A rigid assignment of types calcifies the way you look at the world.
Sorry for the diversion to commingled thoughts.
Ken
On Aug 24, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
Not types of service providers; service providers that provide certain types of services (e.g. data service provider = service provider of data services).
Joe
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
From: Ken Laskey [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:49 AM
To: Chiusano Joseph
Cc: Michael Stiefel;
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] random question
Joe,
But I'm not sure "types" of service providers is relevant. I look at a service description, decide if the real world effects are what I want (and whether the rest of the execution context stuff can be aligned), and then I proceed with the interaction. If I ask for information, I don't know (unless I have a business reason for this to be part of my rationale for which service to use) if it is "data" from a database, results from a simulation, or Mechanical Turk.
Ken
On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
I think it's a question of service providers, but more specifically of what *types* of services. So there can be data service providers, perhaps process service providers (e.g. BPEL-based processes), and perhaps even application service providers in a different sense than the traditional ASP (perhaps service-based applications).
Joe
From: Ken Laskey [mailto:]
Sent: Wed 8/23/2006 10:19 PM
To: Michael Stiefel
Cc:
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] random question
Michael,
My question is whether there are providers in the SOA sense for something other than services. For example, one could say there are data providers but wouldn't they have their data sources accessed using services? Does that apply to all providing stakeholders?
Ken
On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:58 PM, Michael Stiefel wrote:
Aren't users of the services stakeholders?
Aren't manufacturers of equipment stakeholders?
Is the government that collects a tax or regulates a stakeholder?
Aren't the "victims" we discussed at the F2F stakeholders as well?
Michael
At 05:57 PM 8/23/2006, Ken Laskey wrote:
Can we have stakeholders who are providers or maintainers of something other than services? Or, do we assume by the nature of SOA that if you provide something other than a service, that something is a capability that must have a service access, so you always end up a service provider?
Ken
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Ken Laskey \
| MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 |
| 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 |
\ McLean VA 22102-7508 /
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
---
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
smime.p7s
