Re: [soa-rm-ra] Thought Experiment on SOA Security and Governance

Michael,

While the use case is intriguing, I think we should start with something where the governance issue isn't conflated with other high emotion issues.  We will have enough of a challenge when we tell a program manager there are aspects of the program over which s/he doesn't/shouldn't have absolute control.

Ken

On Oct 30, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:

Federated Identity exists today. Both Adobe and Microsoft have server based

products which use a WS-Trust type model on the back end to allow a trusted

region to be declared including CRL's for all CA's.  Sadly, what you are

talking about is largely linked to the weak link in the chain - the people

who administer and operate the trust domain.  The basic tenet is to deny all

and allow only specific trusted entities.  All it takes is one slip.

D

On 10/30/06 11:00 AM, "Chiusano Joseph" <> wrote:

 
My take is that we would never reach the question of federated identity,

because the chances of fraud (especially through a virus) are so high

that it will probably be a very long time before Internet-based voting

is a reality (if at all).

Joe

Joseph Chiusano

Associate

Booz | Allen | Hamilton

______________________--

700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20005

O: 202-508-6514

C: 202-251-0731

Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com

-----Original Message-----

From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:]

Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:40 AM

To: 

Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Thought Experiment on SOA Security and Governance

One of my action items was to come with a scenario that we could use to

think about SOA Governance. Here is one "use case". Try to imagine what

it would take for the United States to have secure Internet voting in

state and federal elections.

Who would offer the "voting service"?

This would be the extreme case of Federated Identity. Would the state

federated identity servers be trusted by the federal identity servers? I

cannot imagine everybody getting an X509 certificate. Would we restrict

voting to a few days?

Comments?

Michael

 

-- 

******************************************************

Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.       *

Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee*

Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com                *

******************************************************

 

 

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Ken Laskey
 
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934
 
7515 Colshire Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379
 
McLean VA 22102-7508
  

smime.p7s