RE: [soa-rm-ra] quick thought on versioning and description

From
Poulin, Michael <>
Date
2007-03-08T15:21:23+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [soa-rm-ra] quick thought on versioning and description
The problem with a single indicator is that we cannot 
provide 1:M indication - a change in the log may be irrelevant to several 
consumers. 

 

If the changes are under the agreement (contract), the 
consumer should not care about them, right?

 

We can recommend, I think, having an archive of the 
service description versions and the changes in the description might be 
viewed from there.

 

I still think that a rule-based version control 
(does not matter how many version positions the implementation prefers) is the 
safe way of addressing multi-version compatibility.

 

Thank you,

- Michael

Fidelity Investments - Web Delivery
Phone: +44-173-783-6038
E-mail: 
 
Web: http://www.fidelity.co.uk/

Important: Fidelity Investments International, Fidelity Investment Services 
Limited, Fidelity Pensions Management and Financial Administration Services 
Limited (a Fidelity Group company) are all authorised and regulated in the UK by 
the Financial Services Authority and have their registered offices at Oakhill 
House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ. Tel 01732 
361144. Fidelity only gives information on products and does not give investment 
advice to private clients based on individual circumstances. Any comments or 
statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity. The information 
transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed 
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in 
error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. All 
e-mails sent from or to Fidelity may be subject to our monitoring procedures. 
Direct link to Fidelity’s website - 
http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.html 

  

  
  From: Ken Laskey [mailto:] 
  
Sent: 08 March 2007 13:59
To: 
  
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] quick thought on 
  versioning and description

  

Would it make sense to add a change log to description where the 
  service provider would list changes that we decide do not constitute the need 
  to update the service version?  Would the version number of the service 
  contain an extra field (thinking of this as an extension to Michael's paper) 
  that indicated a log change but not really anything else?
  

  
Not sure where I'd go with this but wanted to capture the thought before 
  it disappeared.

  

  
Ken

  

  

  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  
Ken Laskey

  
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305   
    phone:  703-983-7934

  
7515 Colshire Drive          
                fax:      
    703-983-1379

  
McLean VA 22102-7508