Re: [soa-rm-ra] Re: [soa-rm] [soa-rm-ra] Call for comments on Version 0.2 (Second time lucky?)

Indeed, there is a lot of content I included and several questions that are grist for discussion.  I consider most of it solid material -- you can ignore much of the text color coding that managed to slip in from earlier versions.

Ken

On Sep 7, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Francis McCabe wrote:

Jeff

 One of the reasons that we are focusing on governance is because we are waiting for the comment period to finish on the current draft. So, please do what you can on Section 4. Even highlighting a paragraph as junk will have the effect of forcing us to pay attention to it going forward.

I intend there to be one more telcon on governance before we process the issues on 0.2

Frank

On Sep 7, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Jeffrey A. Estefan wrote:

 
Don and Frank,

I started making a pass through Section 4 of the Reference Architecture working draft 0.2 and I realized it's still kind of a mess so I gave up.  I saw a lot of draft text, particularly Section 4.2, therefore, I'll wait until others have had their say and updates made, then I'll put my two cents forth.  It seems the focus of discussion on the SC call these days has been on the subject of Governance so once the dust settles, we can return to the topic of Realizing a SOA View.

In the meantime, I've attached an issues list that addresses some editorial comments (very minor ones but important for readability of the document) that target the earlier sections with the caveat that I did not focus much attention on the language of Section 2 - Requirements.  This is something I think we'll want to return to when we're closer to wrapping up Section 5.

Cheers...

- Jeff E. <issueTemplate-2_JAE.xls>
 

 

 

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Ken Laskey
 
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934
 
7515 Colshire Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379
 
McLean VA 22102-7508
  

smime.p7s