← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

service execution context

From
Poulin, Michael <>
Date
2007-09-24T12:46:36+00:00
ID
Thread
service execution context
Folks,

I have another question (which is, probably, 
not the right time to ask since the period of comments for 0.2 version is 
closed... but I will try):

I've just realised that the RA interprets 
'service execution context' from RM as "Within the RM, the 
execution context stood for all the aspects of an information system that 
are needed to facilitate interaction. A large part of the goals of the 
Reference Architecture is to show how interaction is realized". Plus, 
"Descriptions of the provider and consumer are the essential 
building blocks for establishing the execution context of an 
interaction." That is, it is a communication context. 

In another place: "The execution 
context can be thought of as a series of answers to the questions of 
why would the participants be willing to interact and whether such 
interaction is possible", i.e. one can assume that the context may 
include business conditions/context as a factor of willingness to interact. 
This corresponds to the references to the policies in the RM's 
definition (policies, which may apply as to the communication as to the 
execution on the provider side and be agreed in the Service Contract). 

I have read the RM's definition of the 
execution context as both - information AND business context of execution of the 
service rather than just communication information system context. For example, 
assume we have a service for calculating a fund price. We have corporate 
divisions in the US and in the UK working with different funds but in the 
same fund category. Besides different policies, the calculation method is 
different (in the business definition) in the US and the UK. That is, the 
service execution context from business perspective is different. So, before 
reusing the service even in the same information infrastructure, it is better 
to, at least, re-test it even if no one bit of its implementation is 
changed.

I think we have to clear state what is meant 
by  the service execution context in the RA. 

Cheers,

Michael Poulin

Head of Business Analysis and Web 
Architecture

Senior Manager, Web Delivery

Fidelity Investments International

' +44-173-783-6038
*  
8 http://www.fidelity.co.uk/

Important: Fidelity Investments International (Reg. No.1448245), Fidelity 
Investment Services Limited (Reg. No. 2016555), Fidelity Pensions Management 
(Reg. No. 2015142) and Financial Administration Services Limited (Reg. No. 
1629709, a Fidelity Group company) are all registered in England and Wales, are 
authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority and have 
their registered offices at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, 
Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ. Tel 01732 361144. Fidelity only gives information on 
products and does not give investment advice to private clients based on 
individual circumstances. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily 
those of Fidelity. The information transmitted is intended only for the person 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender 
and delete the material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity 
may be subject to our monitoring procedures. Direct link to Fidelity’s website - 
http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.html
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread