Re: [soa-rm-ra] Fw: [soa-rm] Why service composition andcomposite applications are anti-patterns of SOA

For accuracy sake, I concur.


On 9/26/07 2:05 PM, "Jeffrey A. Estefan" <>
wrote:

> Duane,
> 
> Should we revise our discussion of composition of services in the RA we are
> developing to state "aggregation of services" or "service aggregation?"  I
> certainly see your point and from a UML perspective but I also agree with
> you comments in your blog that essentially the 'train has left the station'
> so-to-speak for quite some time now and industry is getting very familiar
> with the nomenclature of "service composition."  Can we expect to buck the
> system via the RA?  Don't know.  Just a question.  And what is the GoF view
> on composition say via the structural Composite Pattern?
> 
> Others?
> 
>  - Jeff E., JPL
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duane Nickull" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:54 AM
> Subject: [soa-rm] Why service composition and composite applications are
> anti-patterns of SOA
> 
> 
>> http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/09/soa-anti-patterns-service-compositio
>> n.html
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> **********************************************************************
>> "Speaking only for myself"
>> Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
>> Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
>> My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
>> MAX 2007 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/07/adobe-max-2007.html
>> **********************************************************************
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
MAX 2007 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/07/adobe-max-2007.html
**********************************************************************