← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [soa-rm-ra] definition of policy

From
Ellinger, Robert S (IS) <>
Date
2009-04-20T23:48:55+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [soa-rm-ra] definition of policy
Please check the draft of the governance and management 
section I sent out

From: Ken Laskey [mailto:] 

Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:21 PM
To: 
 RA
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] definition of 
policy
Importance: High

I was sending off our governance section to assist a sponsor in getting a 
handle on policy as part of governance, and I noticed that the governance 
section doesn't define policy.  I believe this was intentional so as not to 
step on the policy section.  However, the policy section tweaks the RM 
definition of policy and this doesn't adequately reflect policy as already 
included in the governance section models. 

RM:

A policy represents some constraint or condition on the 
use, deployment or description of an owned entity as defined by any 
participant.

Section 4.4.2 (under Policies and Contracts Model):

A policy represents some 
constraint or condition on the use, deployment or description of a resource as 
defined by a participant or, more generally, a stakeholder.

Side issue: the model added in section 4.4.2 includes Obligation and 
Permission as types of Policy Constraints (both with positive connotations) but 
not Prohibition (with a negative connotation) which is an obvious 
constraint.  The policy definition emphasizes constraint -- a seeming lean 
towards the negative side.

These definitions seem much narrower than would be implied in the 
governance section, but with some additional words, we may be able to finesse 
the problem.  

Recall section 5.1.2 defines governance as

Governance is the concept 
of prescribing conditions and constraints consistent with satisfying common 
goals and the structures and processes needed to define and respond to actions 
taken towards realizing those goals. 

The example in the governance section to differentiate Policy, Rule, and 
Regulation says

For 
example, Leadership could set a Policy that all authorized parties should have 
access to data, the Governance Body would promulgate a Rule that PKI 
certificates are required to establish identity of authorized parties, and 
Management can specify a Regulation of who it deems to be a recognized PKI 
issuing body. A number of rules may 
be required to satisfy a given policy; the carrying out of a rule may contribute 
to several policies being realized.

To support the governance section, I need a policy discussion to say 
something like

A policy is the formal characterization of the 
conditions that are deemed necessary to exist or the actions identified to lead 
to such conditions in order to realize the goals which governance is attempting 
to satisfy.  Policies may identify required conditions or actions or may 
prescribe limitations or other constraints on permitted conditions or 
actions.  For example, a policy may 
prescribe that safeguards must be in place to prevent unauthorized access to 
sensitive material.  It may also 
prohibit use of computers for activities unrelated to the specified work 
assignment.  Rules and Regulations (as defined *elsewhere*) specify the 
details of how policy is to be realize.

If I was adding this to the governance section, it would come before the 
first mention of policy in section 5.1.2.1.  The connection is governance 
to policy may still be under-specified even with this definition somewhere. 
 For example, I need to enhance the definition of Leadership in section 
5.1.2.2 to say

Leadership
Leadership is the entity who has the responsibility and 
authority to generate 
consistent policies through which the goals of governance can be expressed 
and to define and champion the 
structures and processes through which governance is 
realized.  

 The underlined phrase is what needs to be added.

Now handling this obviously needs to be coordinated with other sections, so 
let's begin coordinating.  This will also be extremely important in the 
governance discussions with TOG.

Ken

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken Laskey

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305      phone: 703-983-7934

7515 Colshire Drive           
              fax:       703-983-1379

McLean VA 22102-7508
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →