While I am not sure the diagram correctly captures the trust model we
are working on, and I agree that trust is an internal perception or
personal assessment, I haven't said, or bought into a definition that
relies on emotion. An emotional component doesn't even need to be
present, just the perception or assessment. Perception may contain an
emotional component, may indeed not be possible without such. However
assessment needn't, and I think assessment alone can be sufficient.
Cheers,
Rex
At 9:57 AM -0700 4/4/09, Francis McCabe wrote:
>Actually, I am not sure.
>
>We have consistently declared that trust is inherently an internal
>'emotion' :)
>
>That means that trust is not actually a relationship but is a
>private proposition.
>
>Also, we need to find a way to draw this stuff in UML
>
>On Apr 4, 2009, at 9:21 AM, David E. Ellis wrote:
>
>>Ken, Frank, Rex
>>
>>I believe this is a better evaluation of trust since it is always
>>from the Service consumer perspective to initiate. That said, the
>>Service Provider has to trust aspects of the interaction also.
>>
>>We also need to accurately discuss the way the Service provider Adopts Goal.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>><Trust detailed.ppt>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>>generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>><https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>
>
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:smime 1021.p7s ( / ) (0153E879)
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670
