Title: Re: [soa-rm-ra] RE: A general comment on the SOA RA
Not sure that I entirely agree...I suspect many enterprises
could share a concierge repository; but there may be a fly in that
ointment...
From: Lublinsky, Boris
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:06
PM
To: Ellinger, Robert S (IS); Lublinsky, Boris; Duane Nickull;
Jeffrey A. Estefan;
Subject: RE:
[soa-rm-ra] RE: A general comment on the SOA RA
Move
does not mean physically move, it might mean create a reference from a company’s
repository. The end result is that unless a service description/reference to
service description exists in am enterprise repository, its usage will be one
off, which is not a good situation. If the service functionality deems to be
useful, a company typically wants to make an agreement with the service provider
and use it internally as much as possible, thus it wants a link to it from its
local repository.
The
caveat here is that service description requirements can be different between
service provider and consumer, thus it might have to be localized. Finally RA
talks about invocation context (sorry, I really think this is a bad phrasing,
cause typically context is an execution context, which service should not have),
which can be specific for a consumer company and needs to be reflected in local
repository
From: Ellinger, Robert S
(IS) [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009
5:05 PM
To: Lublinsky, Boris; Duane Nickull; Jeffrey A. Estefan;
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] RE: A general
comment on the SOA RA
Why move
it? Why not use it in place, but continue to evaluate it and recommend or
not?
From: Lublinsky, Boris
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:26
AM
To: Ellinger, Robert S (IS); Duane Nickull; Jeffrey A. Estefan;
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] RE: A general
comment on the SOA RA
Well,
this is kinda neat idea, but even with this, someone is doing final approval and
as result a service will be moved to the local repository for company
usage.
From: Ellinger, Robert S
(IS) [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009
8:15 AM
To: Lublinsky, Boris; Duane Nickull; Jeffrey A. Estefan;
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] RE: A general
comment on the SOA RA
Boris:
What
about concierge services that evaluate, (perhaps store) and recommend
services to their clients...I can see a business model for
that.
Bob
From: Lublinsky, Boris
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:09
AM
To: Duane Nickull; Jeffrey A. Estefan;
Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] RE: A general
comment on the SOA RA
Duane,
Agreed.
This was not my point. My point was that regardless of local/global
infrastructure, service repository is always local to an enterprise, based on
afreements between companies
From: Duane Nickull
[mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 9:30
PM
To: Lublinsky, Boris; Jeffrey A. Estefan;
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] RE: A general
comment on the SOA RA
Boris:
On 4/5/09
6:04 PM, "Lublinsky, Boris" <>
wrote:
Another issue that I see in
the document is the fact that while SOA infrastructure is
global
I would argue that it
does not always have to be global. In fact, the scope of deployment or influence
is not critical to it “being” SOA.
Duane
The information contained in this communication may be
CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any
copy of it from your computer or paper files.
The information contained in this communication may be
CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any
copy of it from your computer or paper files.
The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it
from your computer or paper files.
