FW: review needed of new section 3.1

Jeff,

 

Thanks for the feedback.  You provide a good combination of having history but also being removed from the recent discussions.  That gives you perspective while also a bit of distance to ensure we haven’t headed down a blind alley.

 

Also thanks for your offer of updating the models.  You see we have just used sketches while sorting out ideas, so there will definitely be a need for new models and updates.  We’ll let you know when we’re stable enough to make use of your offer.

 

Ken

 

From: Estefan, Jeff A (3180) [mailto:] 
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 6:18 PM
To: Ken Laskey; 
Subject: FW: review needed of new section 3.1

 

Ken and Peter.  Forgot and replied to the raf list, which of course bounced.  So below is a copy of my response. Cheers!  - Jeff

 

From: Estefan, Jeff A (3180) 
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 3:12 PM
To: 
Cc: Thornton, Danny R (IS); 
Subject: RE: review needed of new section 3.1

 

Good additions Ken and Peter.  Let me know when you reach a steady-state on the various changes and I’ll create a new set of diagrams if you need me to.  Cheers!  Also, in the footer and the filename, you are still using “soa-ra-xxx”.  Is the plan to stick with that or move to to “soa-raf-xxx”?  - J