← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
issues 235 and 236 [was: [soa-rm-ra] Groups - SOA-RAF-Minutes-May 23-2012.doc uploaded]
One other item for consideration: I had an action to deal with issue #235. I’m not sure if we missed going over that or it wasn’t minuted. In either case, my suggested response is: added paragraph to end of section 4.3.5.1: Orchestration is typically considered in the context of automated processes; however, human actors may also take part. This may be particularly important in cases where the automation fails and human intervention becomes necessary. In addition, in response to issue #236, I modified the last paragraph in section 4.3.5.2 to read: In a service-oriented business collaboration, a choreography language must be capable of describing the coordination of those service-oriented processes that cross organizational boundaries. In case of an upset, the choreography should provide for contingencies including, as with orchestration, human intervention. These issues are still open pending acceptance of the above or further revision. Ken --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Kenneth Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508 From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Peter F Brown Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:27 PM To: Rex Brooks; Subject: RE: [soa-rm-ra] Groups - SOA-RAF-Minutes-May 23-2012.doc uploaded Rex, I made a few edits and will send this as an updated document – copy attached for into Cheers, Peter From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Rex Brooks Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2012 11:05 To: Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Groups - SOA-RAF-Minutes-May 23-2012.doc uploaded Submitter's message Please review for accuracy. -- Rex Brooks Document Name: SOA-RAF-Minutes-May 23-2012.doc No description provided. Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter: Rex Brooks Group: SOA-RM Reference Architecture SC Folder: Meeting Notes Date submitted: 2012-05-23 11:05:03
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread