We only become polarized if we let that happen. We have questions,
many questions. I believe that some of those get answered as the
questions form a pattern and we address the pattern. The discussion on
security is an example. I (and others) are raising questions and past
experience gives me a bent towards where I believe answers lie, but I
most want to see how this whole puzzle fits together.
I don't want to get off into navel-gazing but let's consider the
questions and practice a little late-binding to the answers.
Ken
On Apr 12, 2005, at 7:20 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
>
>
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
>> I get the strong sense that our TC is now polarized on this - and it
>> is
>> going to be very difficult to move forward in a coherent fashion until
>> we get broad consensus on which approach we should take moving
>> forward.
> I disagree. I think that the touch point discussed today by Rebekah,
> Anders and Matt identifies that the concept of a "security policy"
> touches the RM. It is still very early on. I think very few are 100%
> convinced either way. I would encourage all to keep an open mind at
> this time.
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-883-7934
7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-883-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508
