More comments inline:
Don Flinn wrote:
>Diane
>
>I disagree that a service could allow Java Classes as a parameter. This
>implies how the service is implemented.
>
DN - Actually - it declares that it accepts unstructured data as a
parameter. What happens behind the service interface is still hidden.
> Even if the service can
>translate the Java Classes to some other model, it forces the service to
>understand Java Classes.
>
>
DN - would it be possible that it simply validates the java syntax based
on a parse and some simple rules, yet does not understand it?
On a personal note - I love these types of conversations. This is
definitely some new ground to think about.
Cheers!
Duane
--
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********
