I think services deserve respect, lets try not to exploit them :-)
Gregory A. Kohring wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Perhaps one should use a somewhat broader definition which captures
> the human user as well:
>
> Service Consumer: An entity which exploits a service.
>
>
> -- Greg
>
>
> Thomas Erl wrote:
>
>> Now that we've decided on the term "service consumer" it may be
>> useful to formally define it. The term "consumer" is used by the WS-I
>> Basic Profile wherein it is simply defined as "Software that invokes
>> an instance."
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>
>
