RE: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title

Title: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title

Duane,

 

I can clarify: By saying "if we buy into 
the fact that SOA is a type of Enterprise Architecture," I was referring to the 
definition of SOA at the end of our current draft, which states that SOA is a 
type of Enterprise Architecture. 

 

FWIW, my definition of EA in line 
with what you present below. Hope that helps.

Joe

 

Joseph Chiusano

Booz Allen Hamilton

Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com

From: Duane Nickull 
[mailto:]
Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 1:01 PM
To: 
Chiusano Joseph
Cc: Olson, Chandra S; 

Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document 
title

I am intrigued by the premise of enterprise architecture.  
My definition
of EA is one of area of applicability, not any particular style 
of
architecture such as mainframe, client server, etc.  What is 
your
definition of EA?

Duane

Chiusano Joseph 
wrote:

> 
> By this I mean that, if we buy into the fact 
that SOA is a type of
> Enterprise 
Architecture,

--
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - 
Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Chair - OASIS Service 
Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical Committee -
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm
Vice 
Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe 
Enterprise Developer Resources  - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********