RE: [soa-rm] Fwd: Re: Meeting Minutes for June 15

Sally: concur, I just haven't had time yet this week to 
draft and send...

 

-Peter

From: Sally St. Amand 
[mailto:] 
Sent: 21 June 2005 
20:06
To: SOA-RM
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Fwd: Re: Meeting 
Minutes for June 15

Prasanta

I thought what was going to happen was that Peter was going to send an 
email to the list and that email would be uncover views on the issue, and 
ultimately to prepare a motion to be voted on.

Sally

"Behera, Prasanta" <> 
wrote:

  
  

  

  

  
Since I was the 
  “note-taker” – How do we move this forward?

  
Should I update the 
  “meeting minutes” to reflect that the whole group should be asked instead of 
  specific individuals?

  
I think that was the 
  intent but specific names were mentioned as a starting 
  point.

  
 

  
Thanks,

  
/Prasanta

  
 

  
 

  
 

  

  

  
  

  
From: Sally 
  St. Amand [mailto:] 
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 6:36 
  AM
To: SOA-RM
Subject: [soa-rm] Fwd: Re: Meeting 
  Minutes for June 15

  
 

  

  

  
TC -

  

  
Duane asked that I post an email I sent to him on the 
  list. It is below.

  

  
Sally

Duane Nickull 
  <> 
  wrote:

  
    
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:34:00 
    -0700
From: Duane Nickull <>
Subject: Re: 
    Meeting Minutes for June 15
To: "Sally St. Amand" 
    <>
CC: Peter Brown 
    <>, Rebekah Metz 
    <>,
Joseph Chiusano 
    <>

Thank you Sally. These types of 
    emails need to be sent to the open list 
to maintain 
    transparency.

Can you please repost to the list then we can 
    discuss?

THanks

Duane

Sally St. Amand 
    wrote:

> Duane
> 
> I was looking over the minutes for 
    our last TC concall. I do not think 
> they accurately reflect what 
    went on at the meeting.
> 
> With respect to to the 
    paragraph
>
> *Item 6:*
>
> Sub item 1 (SC part of 
    core RM??) Peter: Use the procedure agreed 
> today to discuss about 
    the issue regarding SC. Peter will work with 
> Joseph and Rebekah to 
    derive wording, then propose vote via list server.
>
> 
    
>
> My recollection was you asked that a notice be sent out on 
    the list to 
> solicit people to formulate the proposal. You did not 
    say it 
> explicitly, but the message I got was that the whole group 
    would be 
> asked who wanted to further address a 
    sub-issue.
>
> 
>
> I have a view on this issue and 
    would like to participate in 
> specifying it not just respond to an 
    up or down vote. To this end I am 
> copying Peter, Joe & Rebekah. 
    And I suspect others have a view they 
> want to 
    express.
>
> 
>
> Sally
>
>