RE: [soa-rm] A new approach

As Yogi might say, "It takes what it takes."

Ciao,
Rex

At 10:36 AM -0400 6/2/05, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>I believe we're already effectively doing that, and that we're in the
>midst of your step 4.
>
>Not to dwell on the past, but we could have taken the approach from the
>very beginning of building something incrementally toward SOA, rather
>than constructing something quickly and then having to go back and forth
>on whether or not it was really SOA. I think this may have been a much
>more effective "plan up front" process.
>
>But somehow we wound up at the same place anyway - so it all worked out.
>Plus we had the opportunity to bring some key issues to the surface in
>the meantime. So perhaps the approach we used was really the best
>afterall.
>
>And here we are, moving forward.
>
>Joe
>
>Joseph Chiusano
>Booz Allen Hamilton
>Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
>
>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: 
>>  [mailto:]
>>  Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:32 AM
>>  To: 
>>  Subject: [soa-rm] A new approach
>>
>>  Hi All,
>>
>>  I agree with Sally's email completely.
>>
>>  I was thinking of a slightly different approach to the
>>  consensus problem.
>>
>>  Why can we not start with a single concept like service and
>>  add more concepts as we progress with consensus being reached
>>  on a continual basis.
>>
>>  1. Service
>>  2. Service + Service Description
>>  3. Service + Service Description + relationships between them
>>  4. Service + Service Description + relationships between them
>>  + policy 5. ...
>>
>>
>>  Comments?
>>
>>  Wes
>>
>>


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309