Thanks Oleg. Duane, can you please clarify whether or not this is
related to the "SOA Message" effort that we discussed on our SOA-RM call
today? I am not certain as this document references only 2 OASIS TCs
(SOA-RM and SOA Adoption Blueprints), whereas the description you
provided lead me to believe that the "SOA Message" effort would include
other TCs such as ebSOA, WS-CAF. Just want to make sure my associations
are correct.
Joe
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
700 13th St. NW
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oleg Mikulinsky [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:09 PM
> To: Duane Nickull; Miko Matsumura;
> ;
> Subject: [soa-rm] Initial draft of paper to explain OASIS SOA
> work to public
>
>
> Duane, Miko,
>
> Attached is version of the "Introduction to the OASIS SOA
> work" that is ready for broader review.
> As I mention before the only Q/A I am not yet sure about is
> the "Business Architecture document" Q/A. I would like to get
> some feedback from the both TC's before we can vote this "in"
> or "out" of the document.
>
> Please send any additions or proposed changes to me to be
> incorporated into the next versions.
>
>
> Regards,
> Oleg.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:16 AM
> To: Oleg Mikulinsky; Jones, Steve G; Miko Matsumura; Ken Laskey
> Subject: RE: Initial draft of paper to eplain OASIS SOA work to public
>
> I concur with Oleg's assessment. This can also be a living
> document although both TC's should initially approve it. I
> would like to recommend that Oleg be the owner of this (sorry
> to put you on the spot), being our official liaison.
>
> Oleg - if this is ready for our call next Wed, I would like
> to place it on the agenda for approval. Perhaps you can flag
> the paragraphs that our TC needs to approve. Thanks.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Duane
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oleg Mikulinsky [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 6:56 AM
> To: Jones, Steve G; Duane Nickull; Miko Matsumura; Ken Laskey
> Subject: RE: Initial draft of paper to eplain OASIS SOA work to public
>
> Steve,
>
> I believe the latest version is the one that contains your edits.
>
> I have a few suggestions on the Business/Functional
> Requirements of SOA Blueprints section and would like TC
> chairs to comment on it.
>
> 1. Business/Functional Requirements are outlined in the
> current SOA-BP charter as integral part of the overall
> implement able technical blueprint.
> 2. Contributed GeneriCo Blueprints have two documents:
> "concepts" and "requirements specification". Concepts
> document has a one pager Business requirements section.
> Requirements specification has mostly functional requirements
> mixed with technical implementation details. GeneriCo
> "Disconnected Profile" does not have business requirements
> section at all.
> 3. I think the charter stated that GeneriCo Blueprints will
> become OASIS SOA-BP draft within 3 months period.
>
> I see the merits for the Business Blueprints Steve is talking
> about, however It would be quite difficult to accomplish this
> even in a scope of the existing contribution and TC charter.
>
> I would like to propose the following:
>
> 1. Lets have a discussion and a formal vote in the SOA-BP TC on the
> subjects: "Is there a need to split the existing Generico BP
> contributions to Business Blueprint and Technical blueprints
> for us to release GeneriCo as a SOA-BP draft.
> 2. Until we have a consensus, I would like to limit Q&A
> document to only the items clearly outlined by both BC
> charters and existing FAQ sections. Regarding a need to
> explain "What is the scope of Business/Functional
> requirements on SOA-BP". I would like to have no more then a
> paragraph for each without referencing "SOA Business
> Blueprints" as this is not referenced in the charter or a current FAQ.
>
> Regards,
> Oleg.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:24 AM
> To: Duane Nickull; Miko Matsumura; Ken Laskey; Oleg Mikulinsky
> Subject: RE: Initial draft of paper to eplain OASIS SOA work to public
>
>
> What stage are we at now on the document, I'm going to update
> the SOA Biz bits and I couldn't work out what was the latest version!
>
> Steve
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:]
> > Sent: 03 October 2005 19:54
> > To: Miko Matsumura; Ken Laskey;
> ; Jones,
> > Steve G
> > Subject: Initial draft of paper to eplain OASIS SOA work to public
> >
>
> > Comments?
> >
>
> > Duane
> >
>
> > *******************************
> > Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT
> > Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee
> > *******************************
>
>
> This message contains information that may be privileged or
> confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It
> is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to
> read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use
> this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message
> in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
> copies of this message.
>
>
