Re: [soa-rm] issue responses to v9 updates

Issue 239: Meta data == "Machine Processable descriptions"

I thought we had a discussion in the list and I believe Duane also
agreed/suggested that "machine processable" may be too concrete ...

I do not think I said the issue is closed but if the TC thinks it's Ok .. I can go along.

Thanks,

/Prasanta

 

  
metadata
  != machine-processable descriptions

On 12/9/05, Matt MacKenzie <> wrote:
Wow!  Good stuff, Ken.

-matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Laskey [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 2:36 PM
To: Don Flinn

Cc: SOA-RM
Subject: [soa-rm] issue responses to v9 updates

Going through the v9 issues I submitted, here are my updates.

Accept changes in v10 and consider issue closed:
268
269
271
272
273

274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
285
289
290
291
292
293
294
296
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309

Issue was not adequately addressed and considered still open:

270 [1.1,94]   (the info in [ ] is the v10 section and line numbers,
respectively)
283 [3.2.3, 440ff]
284 [3.2.3, 444]  (note lines referenced in Motivation should now be
466-477)
286 [
3.2.3.1, 450-457]
287 [3.2.3.2, 460]
288 [3.2.3.2, 464-465]
295 [3.3.1, 492]
297 [3.3.1.2, 525-529]

Also, the following issues are not mine but are related and open unless

closed by their submitters:
239 [3.2.3, 442]  (Prasanta Behera)
251 [3.3.1, 500-547]  (Peter Brown)

Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------

Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934
7515
Colshire
Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508