Re: [soa-rm] Second Public Review`

Hi Duane,

 

Thanks for the doccos. Will get back to you soon if 
there are any issues.

 

Regards,

 

Ram

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  Duane Nickull 
  

  
To: Ram Kumar ; SOA-RM 

  
Cc:  ; Matt MacKenzie 

  
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 5:40 
  AM

  
Subject: [soa-rm] Second Public 
  Review`

  

  

  
Ram:

  
 

  
Please let this be 
  the official notification that our TC has voted to move to a second Public 
  review to allow comments on the sections of the Public Review Draft changed as 
  a result of comments received during the first public 
  review.

  
We understand that 
  the term is for 15 days and unless otherwise notified, the TC would like to 
  commence this immediately.

  
 

  
The drafts are 
  here:

  
PDF - http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/18486/pr-2changes.pdf

  
DOC - http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/18487/wd-soa-rm-pr2.doc

  
Zipped HTML - http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/18488/soa-rm-pr2.html.zip

  
 

  
The issues list 
  showing all comments received during the first public review and their 
  disposition is located here:

  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/18489/IssuesListComments-10.xls

  
 

  
The minutes carrying 
  the motion approved by full majority vote are located 
  here:

  
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/18484/SOA-RM%20Minutes-May-31-2006.doc

  
 

  
Please let Frank, 
  Matt and I know if you require anything further.

  
 

  
Duane

  
 

  

  
*******************************
Adobe 
  Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Adobe Developer 
  Program - http://developer.adobe.com/
Chair - 
  OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee
Personal Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
*******************************

  

  

  
  

  
From: Ram 
  Kumar [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:26 
  PM
To: Duane Nickull; Michael 
  Stiefel; 
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Approval Process 
  For Specification

  
 

  

  
Hi 
  Duane,

  

  
 

  

  
To answer Michael's last/latest 
  email asking specifically about the

  

  
format to log comments, most TCs 
  use a spreadsheet - that's the easiest. 

  

  
But some use word also. They list 
  the date of the comment, who it was from, the general 
  

  

  
description, a link to the actual 
  comment message, and then the disposition status. 
  

  

  
The Chair has to include a link to 
  the comment log in their submission for OASIS Standard 
  

  

  
balloting and it will 
  be included it in the submission announcement. If you need some sample 
  

  

  
of some comment log, let me 
  know.

  

  
 

  

  
Hope this 
  helps.

  

  
 

  

  
Thanks

  

  
 

  

  
Regards,

  

  
 

  

  
Ram

  

  
 

  

  
----- Original Message ----- 
  

  

  
From: "Duane Nickull" 
  <>

  

  
To: "Michael Stiefel" 
  <>; 
  <>

  

  
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 3:29 
  AM

  

  
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Approval 
  Process For Specification

  

  
 

  
He just cut and pasted from the 
  website which doesn't answer the
specific questions we need.  We 
  require the details of what format the
changes are noted in.  I guess 
  we can just submit the comment log unless
notified otherwise.

One 
  thing we have to do is to re-approve it as a Committee Draft by
majority 
  vote.  I will set up the vote for a period of 7 days via
internet once 
  the final draft has been delivered to the 
  committee.

Duane

*******************************
Adobe 
  Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Adobe 
  Developer Program - http://developer.adobe.com/
Chair - 
  OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee
Personal Blog - 
  http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
******************************* 
  

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Stiefel 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 
  3:18 PM
To: 
Subject: 
  [soa-rm] Approval Process For Specification

As per my assignment from 
  today's meeting, here is the reply I got from
Ram 
Kumar:

The TC 
  must track the comments received as well as the disposition of
each 
  
comment. The TC may conduct any number of review cycles (i.e. 
  approval
to 
send a Committee Draft to Public Review, collecting 
  comments, making
edits 
to the specification, etc.). The first public 
  review of a specification 
must take place for a minimum of 60 days, and 
  any subsequent reviews
must 
be held for a minimum of 15 days. Changes 
  made to a specification after
a 
review must be clearly identified in 
  any subsequent review, and the 
subsequent review shall be limited in scope 
  to changes made in the
previous 
review. Before starting another review 
  cycle the specification must be 
re-approved as a Committee Draft and then 
  approved to go to public
review 
by the TC.

If Substantive 
  Changes are made to the specification after the public 
review, whether as 
  a result of public review comments or from Member
input, 
then the TC 
  must conduct another review cycle. The specification may not
be 
  
considered for approval by the TC as a Committee Specification until 
  it
has 
undergone a review cycle during which it has received no 
  comments that 
result in Substantive Changes to the 
  specification.

Approval of a Committee Specification
After the 
  public review of a Public Review Draft the TC may approve the 
  
specification as a Committee Specification. The approval of a Committee 
  
Specification shall require a Special Majority Vote (at least two 
  thirds
of 
the Voting Members vote "yes" and no more than one fourth of 
  the Voting 
Members vote "no". These numbers are based on the total number 
  of Voting

Members, regardless of the number of Voting Members present 
  in the
meeting. 
Abstentions are not counted.) . The TC Chair shall 
  notify the TC 
Administrator that the TC is ready to vote on the approval 
  of the 
specification, and provide to the TC Administrator the location of 
  the 
editable versions of the specification files. The TC Administrator 
  shall

set up and conduct the ballot to approve the Committee 
  Specification.