Re: [soa-rm] OASIS Standard Request

From
Len Maskey
Date
2006-07-26T20:30:30+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [soa-rm] OASIS Standard Request
On a quick read, this looks like it covers all the bases except for the forthcoming certification statements.  I have one small suggestion included inline below.

Ken

On Jul 26, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:

TC:

Please read the following and help out where applicable in order that we are

prepared by August 15th, 2006.

Under the policy and procedures section, the TC chair (moi) must send the

following items to OASIS by the 15th of any month.  Some of these require

your input:

****************Draft submission for OASIS********************************

By way of a special majority vote held between [insert dates here], we are

hereby making a formal submission to advance the OASIS SOA RM TC's Reference

Model for SOA to an OASIS standard status.  Here is our submission package:

       1.Links to the approved Committee Specification in the TC's document

repository, and any appropriate supplemental documentation for the

specification, both of which must be written using the OASIS templates. The

specification may not have been changed between its approval as a Committee

Specification and its submission to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS

Standard, except for the changes on the title page and running footer noting

the approval status and date.

TC Chair:  The link is

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/19361/soa-r

m-cs.pdf

There are no supplemental or other normative documents for inclusion in the

submission.  The title, status and date have been changed.

       2. The editable version of all files that are part of the Committee

Specification;

TC Chair: The editable versions of the document are:

MS Word:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/19362/soa-r

m-cs.doc

HTML:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/download.php/19363/soa-r

m-cs.zip

       3. Certification by the TC that all schema and XML instances included

in the specification, whether by inclusion or reference, including fragments

of such, are well formed, and that all expressions are valid;

TC Chair: Given the abstract nature of the Reference Model, this is not

applicable.  We have no schemas within our specifications.

       4. A clear English-language summary of the specification;

TC Chair: (proposed) This Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture

is an abstract model for understanding significant entities and

relationships between them within a service-oriented environment, and for

the development of consistent standards or specifications supporting that

environment. It is based on unifying concepts of SOA and may be used by

architects developing specific service oriented architectures or in training

and explaining SOA.

Due to its' abstract nature, this reference model is not directly tied to

any standards, technologies or other concrete implementation details. It

provides a common semantics that can be used unambiguously across and

between different implementations.

While service-orientation may be a popular concept found in a broad variety

of applications, this reference model focuses on the field of software

architecture. The concepts and relationships described may apply to other

"service" environments; however, this specification makes no attempt to

completely account for use outside of the software domain.

       5. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to

similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations;

TC Chair: (Proposed) This work is abstract in nature and 

the vocabulary and relationships defined are

meant to be used as

a template by those who architect SOA.  Accordingly, it would be relevant to

most SOA activities including the Web Service technology family, any XML

based language that may be used within an SOA, W3C specifications for Web

Services including WSDL and WS-Policy work and other software architecture

practices and standards.  It will likely be of interest to ISO, IEEE, IETF,

W3C, UN/CEFACT, AIAG, AIA, the Ontolog Forum, Open Group and many other

standards organizations.

       6. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that

they are successfully using the specification;

TC Chair: TBD - we require this.  To certify such, please send an email to

the general SOA RM list stating the name of your organization, that you are

using the Reference Model as a guide for architecture with success and your

name and company name.  This is for OASIS Member Organizations only and we

require at least 3.

       7. The beginning and ending dates of the public review(s), a pointer

to the announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an account of

each of the comments/issues raised during the public review period(s), along

with its resolution;

TC Chair: There were two Full Public Reviews that happened.

The first public review towards becoming a Committee Specification occurred

between 13 February 2006, and ends 14 April 2006. The accouncement may be

found here:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200602/msg00013.html

The second public review towards becoming a Committee Specification occurred

5 June 2006 to 20 June 2006.  The announcement may be found here:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/soa-rm/200606/msg00003.html

The full transcripts of all comments and dispositions are may be linked to

from this page:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/documents.php

Under the "issues" folder.  They are expressed in Microsoft Excel

Spreadsheet format along with a resolution for each and every comment

submitted.  To our knowledge, there are no outstanding disagreements with

the resolutions for any comment.

       8. An account of and results of the voting to approve the

specification as a Committee Specification, including the date of the ballot

and a pointer to the ballot;

TC Chair: The ballot for approval as a Committee Specification opened July

12, 2006 and closed July 19, 2006.  The ballot results were 100% in favor

and the ballot details are archived here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm/ballot.php?id=1069

       9.An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any

earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification,

together with the originating TC's response to each comment;

TC Chair: This is the first time the RM for SOA has been forwarded as a

candidate for OASIS Standard, hence there are no pointers available.

      10. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the

originating TC;

TC Chair:

The publicly visible comments archive is available at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/soa-rm-comment/

      11.A pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more Members

who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee Specification, which

report may include statements regarding why the member voted against the

specification or that the member believes that Substantive Changes were made

which have not gone through public review; or certification by the Chair

that no minority reports exist.

TC Chair: I hereby certify that no minority reports exist.

 

 

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Ken Laskey
 
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934
 
7515 Colshire Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379
 
McLean VA 22102-7508
  

smime.p7s