Hello Duane, glad to hear it. Liaisons between OASIS TCs are
encouraged & supported by our Liaison Policy [1]. If specific
persons were identified, can we get their names? Typically, as the
Liaison Policy suggests, liaison positions should be populated by
persons who hold the requisite memberships & rights (whatever they
might be) in both organizations. In that way, the person serving as
liaison is in a position to comply with any applicable rules or
filters, when cross-posting whatever matters ought to be shared
between the two groups.
Kind regards Jamie
~ James Bryce Clark
~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS
~
[1]
Duane Nickull wrote:
> Jamie, Ram:
> We voted during our last meeting Jan 24, 2007 to establish an
> official liaison with the Open Group to work together for their
> work on SOA ontology. The scope of the liaison activity will
> largely involve collaboration and harmonization of SOA terms. We
> do not anticipate that this should be an issue as we are not
> contributing anything from OASIS to the Open Group and currently
> they are relatively harmonized on the Reference Model itself. We
> have not yet communicated this to the Open Group formally. We
> have two co-liaisons appointed.
> Please advise us if this raises any issue. If we do not hear back from
> OASIS staff within 7 days, we will regard this as a non issue.
> Thank you
> Duane Nickull
