Re: [soa-rm] PART 2: PGFSOA - Review & Comment Request - Practical Guide to Federal Service Oriented Architecture

Hey guys,

I didn't say this was bad.  My question is whether it's consistent with our thoughts, whether their heading down ratholes that we have sidestepped, or whether they have any great insights we want to lift?

Ken

On Mar 12, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Vitello, Robert J (LABOR) wrote:

And further, the federal effort is a work in progress too, though they hope to draw some conclusions at end end of the month. A session at today's SOA Consortium meeting was devoted to asking for wide participation in building on their wiki.

----- Original Message -----

From: Jeffrey A. Estefan <>

To:  <>

Sent: Wed Mar 12 18:49:21 2008

Subject: Re: [soa-rm] PART 2: PGFSOA - Review & Comment Request - Practical Guide to Federal Service Oriented Architecture

...And we all need to remember that the OASIS effort is an INTERNATIONAL 

activity and FSOA is a U.S. Federal Government activity. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

 

 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken Laskey

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305      phone: 703-983-7934

7151 Colshire Drive                         fax:       703-983-1379

McLean VA 22102-7508

 

smime.p7s