I've actually already sent a reply to him - will forward to askthetab list. while in general "what makes for a substantive change" or "how to handle errata" would be a good thing for the TAB to create, this really was a "here's the TC Process rule and an example" which I answered.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Martin Chapman <> wrote:
If it breaks backwards compatibility it would be substantive.
If they have schema examples of what they want to change from
and to that would be good to illustrate.
Martin.
From:
William Cox [mailto:]
Sent: 14 January 2009 20:34
To: Ask The TAB
Subject: [tab-askthetab] [Fwd: [askthetab] errata question] - Question 2
This is Question 2. I'll put it
in the archives later today.
bill
--
William Cox
Email:
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax
--
Mary P McRae
Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
voip: 603.232.9090
