Nigel, Colin
Have now had a chance to review Nigel's comments/questions, and
Colin's additions.
Rather than coment inline on the individual points in the Wiki, I
thought it would be sensible to give an overall reaction by
email.
My first point is that I found all the points on the wiki very
reassuring! It was always a worry that you might spot gaping holes in our
model, but your headline finding is that it is basically fit-for-purpose -
although with some areas which need addressing in more detail or giving
more emphasis. I agree with all of your points, and am confident they
are already contained within in our framework. Basically, I see all
of the issues you raise as falling into one of three
categories:
the
issue is already contained in our business model, but you think it warrants
greater emphasis (for example, use of intermediaries)
the
issue is covered in our wider framework, but just not under the section
on "business model" (for example, the "citizens have multiple roles" problem
is addressed in the section on Identity Management, and data access is
addressed in section on Citizen Empowerment)
the
issue is already covered but in the more detailed, so far unpublished layers
of our model (for example, your point about the need for more detail on
governance, or how the business model is
"powered")
There is clearly an
interaction here with the work Peter and I have started on the shape of the
overall framework. For example, on the second set of issues listed above,
we need to decide which issues to deal with under the "business model" heading,
and which to deal with under other elements of the
framework.
If you agree, I
suggest that a useful next step might be for Nigel and I to get together in
London with a white board, and go through the current version of the business
model looking at how best to address all of these points, with the aim of
recommending a revised visual representation, and a view on the right boundaries
between "business model" and other issues in the wider framework. What do
you think Nigel? I could do a session on Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday
morning next week. If you have time in that window, we'd be able to have a
first pass at this ahead of the TC call on Thursday
afternoon.
Chris
Parker
Managing
Partner, CS Transform Ltd,
+44
7951 754 060
From: Colin Wallis
[mailto:]
Sent: 11 January 2011
00:30
To:
Subject: [tgf] RE: TGF
Business Model
Thanks
Nig
I put my thoughts
in..
From:
Greenaway Nigel [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday,
11 January 2011 12:06 a.m.
To:
Subject: [tgf] TGF Business
Model
Hi All,
I
have put some comments/suggestions on the Business model up on the wiki at
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/tgf
I would welcome your comments on this
Regards
Nig
Nig Greenaway
Government Division
FUJITSU SERVICES
Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN
Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637
Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147
E-mail:
Web: http://uk.fujitsu.com
Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056, Registered
Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW
This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its
contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu
Services does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and
amended or that it is virus-free.
From: John
Borras [mailto:]
Sent: 10 January 2011
09:00
To:
Subject: [tgf] OASIS TGF
TC - ACTIONS FROM LAST MEETING
Hi All
Welcome back after the festive break.
Just a gentle reminder to start the New year of the actions from our last TC
meeting. Can I ask that we have some positive progress to report on next
week’s call from everyone please and if decisions are needed on any aspect can
the question(s) be posted in advance of the call. I’ll be posting the
agenda, call-in details and any relevant papers for the TC call later this
week.
Actions:
1.
John to keep the EC abreast
of the developments of the TC. – Peter will be reporting on his recent meeting
with Karel de Vriendt
2.
John to obtain webcast users
from WB.
3.
Assignees to prepare output for
approval or decisions at next meeting.
a.
Peter/Chris- to produce the
reference model, glossary of terms and the development of the overall framework
and narrative
b.
Oliver/Colin – Validate the
set of Principles
c.
Andy – Validate the
CSFs
d.
Nigel – Validate the
Business change model
e.
All – to sign up to the Wiki and
contribute to the discussions on the various aspects.
4.
Gershon to review OECD
activity.
5.
Steve to post OECD white paper
to Wiki.
6.
Gershon/Peter to translate key
materials in other languages in due course.
7.
John – to arrange for a Wiki to
be set up to enable discussions and collaboration -
completed
Regards
John
Borras
Chair OASIS TGF
Technical Committee
m. +(0)44 7976
157745
Skype:
gov3john
====
CAUTION: This email
message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and
erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you.
====
