RE: TGF Business Model

Thanks
Chris

 

All
good points, and an excellent issues categorisation summary.

 

You
know your way around your own docs to a depth none of us will ever be able to
emulate. But by the end of this project we will be closer than we are today:-) 

 

Cheers

Colin

 

 

From: Chris Parker
[mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, 11 January 2011 10:26 p.m.

To: Colin Wallis; 

Subject: RE: TGF Business Model

 

Nigel,
Colin

 

Have
now had a chance to review Nigel's comments/questions, and Colin's additions.

 

Rather
than coment inline on the individual points in the Wiki, I thought it would be
sensible to give an overall reaction by email.

 

My
first point is that I found all the points on the wiki very reassuring! 
It was always a worry that you might spot gaping holes in our model,
but your headline finding is that it is basically fit-for-purpose -
 although with some areas which need addressing in more detail or giving
more emphasis.  I agree with all of your points, and am confident
they are already contained within in our framework.  Basically, I see
all of the issues you raise as falling into one of three categories:

 
the
     issue is already contained in our business model, but you think it
     warrants greater emphasis (for example, use of intermediaries)

 
the
     issue is covered in our wider framework, but just not under the
     section on "business model" (for example, the "citizens
     have multiple roles" problem is addressed in the section on Identity
     Management, and data access is addressed in section on Citizen
     Empowerment)

 
the
     issue is already covered but in the more detailed, so far unpublished
     layers of our model (for example, your point about the need for more
     detail on governance, or how the business model is "powered")

 

There
is clearly an interaction here with the work Peter and I have started on the
shape of the overall framework.  For example, on the second set of issues
listed above, we need to decide which issues to deal with under the
"business model" heading, and which to deal with under other elements
of the framework.

 

If
you agree, I suggest that a useful next step might be for Nigel and I to get
together in London with a white board, and go through the current version of
the business model looking at how best to address all of these points, with the
aim of recommending a revised visual representation, and a view on the right
boundaries between "business model" and other issues in the wider
framework.  What do you think Nigel?  I could do a session on
Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday morning next week.  If you have time in
that window, we'd be able to have a first pass at this ahead of the TC call on
Thursday afternoon.

Chris
Parker

Managing
Partner, CS Transform Ltd, +44 7951 754 060

 

 

From: Colin
Wallis [mailto:] 

Sent: 11 January 2011 00:30

To: 

Subject: [tgf] RE: TGF Business Model

Thanks
Nig

I
put my thoughts in..

 

From: Greenaway Nigel
[mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, 11 January 2011 12:06 a.m.

To: 

Subject: [tgf] TGF Business Model

 

Hi All,

           
I have put some comments/suggestions on the Business model up on the wiki at http://wiki.oasis-open.org/tgf  

 

I would welcome your comments on this

Regards 

Nig 

Nig Greenaway 

Government Division 

FUJITSU SERVICES 

Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8SN 

Tel: +44 (0) 843 354 5637 Internal: 7302 5637 

Mob : +44 (0) 7867 833147 Internal: 7383 3147 

E-mail: 

Web: http://uk.fujitsu.com

Fujitsu Services Limited, Registered in England no 96056,
Registered Office 22 Baker Street, London, W1U 3BW 

This e-mail is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents
are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu Services
does not guarantee that this e-mail has not been intercepted and amended or
that it is virus-free. 

 

From: John Borras [mailto:]

Sent: 10 January 2011 09:00

To: 

Subject: [tgf] OASIS TGF TC - ACTIONS FROM LAST MEETING

 

Hi All

 

Welcome back after the festive break. 
Just a gentle reminder to start the New year of the actions from our last TC meeting. 
Can I ask that we have some positive progress to report on next week’s
call from everyone please and if decisions are needed on any aspect can the
question(s) be posted in advance of the call.  I’ll be posting the
agenda, call-in details and any relevant papers for the TC call later this
week.

 

Actions:

1.      
John to keep the EC abreast
of the developments of the TC. – Peter will be reporting on his recent
meeting with Karel de Vriendt

2.      
John to obtain webcast
users from WB.  

3.      
Assignees to prepare output for
approval or decisions at next meeting.

a.      
Peter/Chris- to produce the
reference model, glossary of terms and the development of the overall framework
and narrative

b.     
Oliver/Colin –
Validate the set of Principles

c.      
Andy – Validate the
CSFs

d.     
Nigel – Validate the Business
change model 

e.     
All – to sign up to the
Wiki and contribute to the discussions on the various aspects.

4.      
Gershon to review OECD
activity.

5.      
Steve to post OECD white paper
to Wiki.

6.      
Gershon/Peter to translate key
materials in other languages in due course.

7.      
John – to arrange for a
Wiki to be set up to enable discussions and collaboration - completed

 

 

Regards

John Borras

 

Chair OASIS TGF
Technical Committee

 

m. +(0)44 7976
157745

Skype: 
gov3john

 

====

CAUTION:  This email message and any attachments contain information that
may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please
notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments.
Thank you.

==== 

====
CAUTION:  This email message and any attachments contain 
information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or 
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in 
error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and 
attachments. Thank you.
====