OASIS TGF TC MEETING 19 JANUARY - PAPERS

Please find attached the papers for our TC call next Thursday, 19 th January.
Just a reminder that we agreed to move the start time to 19.00 CET.
Steve - can you confirm to everybody that it’s OK to use your conference call number please.
In case you haven’t seen the ballot results yet, both were approved and we can now look to move onto the next stage and I’ll cover what’s necessary on the call.
In the attached zip file you will find a new Working Draft of the Policy Products Committee Note.
This includes a number of changes resulting from our working call and also a new presentation of the matrix as proposed by Peter.
I’ve included a red-lined version if you want to see the changes from WD02.
There’s still much to do on this including validating all the examples, beefing up the Descriptions and Problem Addressed boxes, and we’ll need to agree how to carve up that workload on the call.
Nig – I don’t know how far this new layout goes to meeting your expectations in the light of the Information Principles document?
Perhaps you could share your thoughts before the call.
A note of absences would be appreciate in advance of the call please.
Regards John Chair OASIS TGF Technical Committee m.
+(0)44 7976 157745 Skype: gov3john www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?
wg_abbrev=tgf Attachment: TC Meeting Papers.zip Description: Zip compressed data --- Begin Message --- From : "Chet Ensign" <> To : "John Borras" <> Date : Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:42:03 -0000 Oh, the quote is "...saying whether its use included...".
If interoperation isn't relevant to the application of the specification then of course you needn't provide any.
I sent the new definition along mainly because of
(a) the bit about listing the conformance clauses that apply and
(b) making sure the SoU comes from the Primary Rep. If you have a statement along the lines of "Ministry xx of the government of NZ is using TGF PL v1.0 in its yyy system in compliance with clauses x, y and z. This application does not require interoperation of multiple implementations." then you have met the requirements of the definition.
Best, /chet On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:39 AM, John Borras <> wrote:
> Peter >
> It strikes me that the SOA Reference Model would have the same problem as us
> in getting 3 Statements of Use. There's no interoperability between systems
> involved in TGF or SOA so how can we give the required Statements? Perhaps
> Colin is right, this is one for the TAB. Views? >
> John > >