<< My main question is whether including the conformance criteria is the right thing to do?
As well as nearly doubling the length, it introduces new terms and concepts that haven't been explained.
>> Fair point, but it is a standard after all so that is the essence of its raison d’etre.
If we were to, say, move it to an appendix/annex we would want to be sure that that was normative, under OASIS rules.
.
Cheers Colin
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Mark Woodward Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2013 7:45 a.m.
To: Chris Parker
Cc: John Borras; TGF TC List
Subject: Re: [tgf] TGF v2 Review Chris and John, I agree with Chris that this would be best as a separate document, there is much more chance of it being read by the target audience. I think Chris has taken a sound approach in assembling, and I agree that this will make keeping the document in line with the Framework itself much easier. As a result the only suggestion I've made in the attached version is to merge and reduce two paragraphs into one, see what you think (it also removes another one of those errant references to cities). My main question is whether including the conformance criteria is the right thing to do? As well as nearly doubling the length, it introduces new terms and concepts that haven't been explained. Regards, Mark Mark Woodward Mill Beck Consulting Limited
Tel: +44 (0) 7788 414553
Email: www.millbeckconsulting.co.uk On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:44, Chris Parker <
> wrote: <TGF v2 Executive Summary v0.1.doc>
