TGF v2 Review

From
Colin Wallis <>
Date
2013-11-18T20:25:00+00:00
ID
Thread
TGF v2 Review
OK, thanks.
Sorry.
.been slightly disconnected with extensive travelling of late.
All non-normative in the Exec Summary.
Fine.
Well, it’s just a matter of collective personal preference then.
.whether to include conformance and if so in the main body or an appendix.
That said, it’s kind of unusual to have an Exec Summary with an appendix, so it probably comes down to a group decision whether it is in, or out.
Cheers Colin
From: John Borras [mailto:] Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013 10:39 p.m.
To: Colin Wallis
Cc: 'TGF TC List'
Subject: RE: [tgf] TGF v2 Review Just to be clear if we make the Exec Summary a Committee Note as is being proposed the question of normative doesn't come into play, everything is regarded as being non-normative. John
From: Colin Wallis [ mailto: ] Sent: 18 November 2013 01:03
To: 'Mark Woodward'; Chris Parker
Cc: John Borras; TGF TC List
Subject: RE: [tgf] TGF v2 Review << My main question is whether including the conformance criteria is the right thing to do? As well as nearly doubling the length, it introduces new terms and concepts that haven't been explained.>> Fair point, but it is a standard after all so that is the essence of its raison d’etre. If we were to, say, move it to an appendix/annex we would want to be sure that that was normative, under OASIS rules.. Cheers Colin
From:  [ mailto: ] On Behalf Of Mark Woodward Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2013 7:45 a.m.
To: Chris Parker
Cc: John Borras; TGF TC List
Subject: Re: [tgf] TGF v2 Review Chris and John, I agree with Chris that this would be best as a separate document, there is much more chance of it being read by the target audience. I think Chris has taken a sound approach in assembling, and I agree that this will make keeping the document in line with the Framework itself much easier. As a result the only suggestion I've made in the attached version is to merge and reduce two paragraphs into one, see what you think (it also removes another one of those errant references to cities). My main question is whether including the conformance criteria is the right thing to do? As well as nearly doubling the length, it introduces new terms and concepts that haven't been explained. Regards, Mark Mark Woodward Mill Beck Consulting Limited
Tel: +44 (0) 7788 414553

Email:  www.millbeckconsulting.co.uk On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:44, Chris Parker < 
> wrote: <TGF v2 Executive Summary v0.1.doc>